Weekly SEO reporting
Automate collection and formatting; retain checks on dates, definitions and commentary before sharing a report.
Open this in the calculatorUse this free calculator to work out the ROI of marketing automation for a specific workflow: the time it frees up, the tool costs, first-year ROI and the payback period.
Start from an illustrative marketing workflow, then adjust every assumption. Presets are examples, not measured client results.
Choose the currency for all your inputs. Changing it changes labels, not amounts; no exchange-rate conversion is applied. Preset amounts are illustrative in any currency.
The proportion of the current workflow that can sensibly be automated.
Keep this conservative when the workflow still requires judgement or approval.
The likely reduction in avoidable errors, repetition and correction time.
A positive result does not automatically make a workflow suitable for AI. Data access, privacy, edge cases, output review, adoption and the cost of failure all affect the decision. The calculator is designed to start a better discovery conversation.
One person spends five hours a week on a task at £30 an hour: £7,800 a year in time value. Automating 50% of the task and saving 50% of the time within that portion recovers £1,950 of capacity. With £600 a year in new tools, no other benefits and £1,000 setup cost, annual net benefit is £1,350. First-year net benefit is £350, ROI is 35%, and payback is about 8.9 months.
This is an illustration, not a promised saving. Avoid counting rework hours twice if they are already in your weekly hours. The five-year estimate holds annual assumptions constant; it excludes inflation, discounting and changes in adoption. Include ongoing maintenance in future costs.
Need help testing the assumptions? Talk to a marketing workflow consultant or download the workflow worksheet.
Marketing automation ROI compares the value of a change with its cost. This calculator includes the value of recovered staff time, so its result is a capacity-based business case. It is not a forecast of extra revenue or cash in the bank. Cash savings arise only when spending actually falls; capacity is valuable when people can use it for other work.
Start with a measured baseline. Time several normal runs of the process, record the people involved and separate preparation, review and correction. Use a fully loaded hourly cost if appropriate. Keep review time in the future workflow, and avoid counting the same rework both as hours saved and as a separate cost reduction.
Include licences, API usage, monitoring, maintenance and human review in future monthly costs. Include discovery, integration, testing, documentation and training in setup costs. If old subscriptions remain, include them in future costs too. The tool assumes steady use across 52 weeks; lower the weekly hours to represent holidays, seasonality or a gradual rollout.
For a simple three-year comparison, current cost is three times the current annual cost. Proposed cost is setup cost plus three times the future annual cost. The difference is three times annual net benefit minus setup cost. This assumes the same workload, prices and adoption each year and does not discount future value. A finance team may need a phased model with its own discount rate.
Copy the summary for a base case, then reduce coverage, time savings and error reduction and increase future costs. Copy that cautious case too. Agree what would stop the pilot, who owns the calculation, and what evidence would justify wider rollout. A large percentage based on a tiny setup cost deserves particular scrutiny.
Compare time per completed task, review effort, correction rate, adoption and output quality against the baseline. Record actual tool spend separately from capacity recovered. Revisit the model if people bypass the workflow, review takes longer than expected or the source data changes.
These presets illustrate assumptions to test, not measured client results. Each opens the calculator with a different starting point.
Automate collection and formatting; retain checks on dates, definitions and commentary before sharing a report.
Open this in the calculatorGather approved market sources into a review queue; check relevance, source dates and evidence before recommending action.
Open this in the calculatorOrganise approved research into briefs; keep editorial judgement, factual checks and brand approval with a person.
Open this in the calculatorPrepare comparable campaign summaries; verify spend, attribution and lead quality before changing a budget.
Open this in the calculatorGroup approved feedback into themes; review ambiguous comments and protect personal information before sharing findings.
Open this in the calculatorIn this model, first-year ROI is annual net benefit minus setup cost, divided by setup cost, multiplied by 100. Annual benefit includes recovered time value, rework savings and the change in software costs. The formula and worked example above show each step.
There is no universal target. Agree an acceptable payback period and quality standard with your team. Check that the case still makes sense with lower adoption and higher costs, and separate cash savings from recovered capacity.
Payback is setup cost divided by monthly net benefit. The result assumes benefits start immediately and stay constant. A gradual rollout or training period will delay real payback. If annual net benefit is zero or negative, the model does not reach payback.
Use measured baseline effort, a complete cost inventory and a cautious scenario. Show a three-year cost comparison, distinguish cash from capacity and agree a pilot with acceptance checks before committing to a wider rollout.
Track hours per completed task, review and rework, tool costs, actual usage and output quality. A faster workflow that produces less reliable work is not a successful outcome.
Yes. Start with the content research and briefs preset for content automation, or choose the closest workflow for an AI ROI estimate. Include editing, review and ongoing maintenance, and replace every preset assumption with your own evidence.